Environmental sentencing
-
Legal Development 2024年4月8日 2024年4月8日
-
英国和欧洲
-
Climate change risk
Environmental sentencing update
| Date | Turnover/size of company (N.B approx only) |
Court | Fine | Sector | Incident type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20th Feb | £1,965.9 million | Cannock Magistrates' Court | One fine for each charge: £1 million and £1,027,000 | Water | The defendant water company allowed huge amounts of raw sewage to discharge into a river. Approximately 470 million litres of raw sewage was discharged. Approximately 260 million of this illegally, as it was in contravention of the conditions of the Environmental Permit. The judge found there was a reckless failure by the defendant to have in place and implement a proper system of contingency planning. The defendant pleaded guilty to two charges. |
| 22nd Feb | 25.8 million | Nottingham Crown Court | £16,000 | Waste |
The defendant waste transport company caused liquid cyanide to leak from a lorry to an industrial estate. It prompted the Fire Service to set up decontamination protocols and caused hundreds of fish deaths in a nearby pond. |
| 15th Jan | Small company | Exeter Magistrates' Court | £4,300 | Agriculture |
The defendant farm admitted polluting a watercourse and disposal of controlled waste in a manner likely to cause environmental pollution or harm to human health. Water contaminated with slurry was running into surface water drains connected with the pipe discharging to the stream. Slurry was also running off the yard and mixing with effluent from an improperly constructed silage clamp. This subsequently flowed several hundred metres across land into the water course. |
| 19th Jan | Small company | Newport Magistrates' Court | £2,605 | Construction | The defendant design and construction company demolished a building where protected Pipistrelles bats were known to be roosting. The director of the company pleaded guilty to breaching the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2017 (as amended). |
| 14th Feb | Small company | n/a | Pledged £20,935.76 to the Berks, Bucks and Oxon Wildlife Trust | Manufacturing | The defendant manufacturing company failed to comply with packaging waste regulations designed to protect the environment. Contrary to the Producer Responsibility Obligations (Packaging Waste) Regulations 2007 (as amended), the defendant failed to register and to take reasonable steps to recover and recycle packaging waste. It therefore avoided paying to offset its obligation based on how much packaging it handled in the previous calendar year. |
结束