Daniel Ling

Profil complet

Daniel Ling is an Associate in the Singapore office and has been practicing law in Singapore since 2020. His practice focuses on international arbitration, commercial litigation, corporate investigations and regulatory compliance. Daniel advises clients in corporate investigations, as well as in regulatory and enforcement actions by various the regulatory agencies in Singapore. Daniel also represents clients in commercial dispute resolution matters, including in proceedings before international arbitral tribunals and the Singapore courts.

Prior to joining Clyde & Co, Daniel was a Deputy Public Prosecutor at the Financial Crimes Division of the Attorney-General’s Chambers in Singapore. He has extensive experience prosecuting complex white-collar matters including securities fraud, corruption, and cheating. He was heavily involved in various investigations conducted by the Singapore Commercial Affairs Division, Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau, and the Monetary Authority of Singapore. He also has extensive experience litigating matters before the Singapore courts, including cases against Senior Counsels.

Expérience

• Medical devices: Successfully provided legal advice in relation to dealer’s licences by the Health Sciences Authority in relation to a business acquisition by an MNC. 
• Environmental: Successfully provided legal advice in relation to queries by the Monetary Authority of Singapore in relation to breaches of environmental regulations in Malaysia.
• Personal data: Successfully provided legal advice in relation to a corporate Data Incident Protection Plan in relation to incidents of data breach.
• Anti-bribery and corruption: Successfully conducted a training on anti-bribery and corruption for a large shipping MNC headquartered in the United States.
• Aviation: Represented an MNC in regulatory investigations by the Transport Safety Investigation Bureau and Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore in relation to a serious incident during take-off.
• Cryptocurrency: Represented a claimant in international arbitration proceedings to sue a cryptocurrency exchange for multi-million-dollar losses caused to the client by a hacking incident.