Andrew is a Partner in the Catastrophic Injury and Large Loss Team and leads the firm’s Subject Matter Group offering. He specialises in defending personal injury claims of the utmost severity, with experience of all of the major injury types, including brain and spinal injury, amputations and fatal accidents.
His portfolio includes serious brain injury cases, tetraplegic cases and fatal accidents with values over £20m.
Andrew has been at the forefront of identifying and agreeing best practice with some of the leading claimant firms to support swifter resolution of catastrophic injury claims.
In the legal directories, Andrew is rated above Band 1 as a ‘star individual’ and is described as a ‘leading personal injury lawyer’. He is known for his instruction on some of the most complex and high-value claims in this space: ‘Andrew oversees many high-value claims and also has an excellent market reputation.’ Clients describe him as a ‘very knowledgeable’ lawyer, adding that they ‘can’t recommend him highly enough.
Expérience
Supreme Court case of Wilkinson v Churchill and Evans v Equity
Andrew is a Partner in the Catastrophic Injury and Large Loss Team and leads the firm’s Subject Matter Group offering. He specialises in defending personal injury claims of the utmost severity, with experience of all of the major injury types, including brain and spinal injury, amputations and fatal accidents.
His portfolio includes serious brain injury cases, tetraplegic cases and fatal accidents with values over £20m.
Andrew has been at the forefront of identifying and agreeing best practice with some of the leading claimant firms to support swifter resolution of catastrophic injury claims.
In the legal directories, Andrew is rated above Band 1 as a ‘star individual’ and is described as a ‘leading personal injury lawyer’. He is known for his instruction on some of the most complex and high-value claims in this space: ‘Andrew oversees many high-value claims and also has an excellent market reputation.’ Clients describe him as a ‘very knowledgeable’ lawyer, adding that they ‘can’t recommend him highly enough.
Expérience
Supreme Court case of Wilkinson v Churchill and Evans v Equity