Pratiques professionnelles
Free advice – but can you prove breach of duty?
Cliquez sur chaque termes pour accéder aux articles correspondants
Final content not approved by partners
Notre équipe dédiée à la responsabilité des professions émergentes est un chef de file dans l’aide à nos clients assureurs dans la conception de produits et la rédaction de politiques et a développé une véritable expertise dans ce domaine. Nous reconnaissons l’importance croissante de ce secteur pour les compagnies d’assurance et nous avons répondu aux besoins du marché en proposant des solutions novatrices et commercialement saines pour les nouvelles réclamations et leurs processus.
Nous avons de l’expérience dans le traitement des demandes individuelles et dans la spécification des travaux pour les compagnies d’assurance concernant un large éventail de professionnels, y compris les organisations caritatives/associations, les concepteurs, les consultants en éducation, les consultants en gestion, les administrateurs d’hypothèques, les professionnels du marketing et les rédacteurs testamentaires.
Notre équipe comprend que les professions considérées comme émergentes dans un territoire peuvent être bien établies dans une autre. Nous nous appuyons donc sur nos connaissances approfondies du secteur, issues de notre réseau international, et sur notre compréhension des coutumes locales pour guider les compagnies d’assurance à cet égard.
Successfully defended a notable and valuable stress at work/protection from harassment claim on behalf of a large corporate entity resulting in nil damages and substantial recovery of defence costs.
Providing strategic advice to the ABI and its members following the MoJ consultation into mesothelioma claims.
Acting on behalf of Ladbrokes in the recent Court of Appeal case of Nicholls v Ladbrokes (2013) ECWA Civ 1963, a Post Traumatic Stress Disorder case involving allegations of negligence and breach of statutory duty following an armed robbery.
We successfully defended the Defendant in the case of Marian Holloway v Tyne Thames Technology Ltd, in which a UK court considered de minimis issues in a noise induced hearing loss (NIHL) case. This was a significant and positive decision for insurers continuing to face an unprecedented surge in deafness claims.
Acting on behalf of a Local Authority in the Mesothelioma Trigger Litigation in the Supreme Court leading to a successful judgment that policies of Employers liability insurance will respond for injuries sustained or contracted at the date of inhalation of asbestos. BAI (Run Off) Limited (In Scheme of Arrangement) v Durham [2012] UKSC 14.
Successfully defended a notable and valuable stress at work/protection from harassment claim on behalf of a large corporate entity resulting in nil damages and substantial recovery of defence costs.
Providing strategic advice to the ABI and its members following the MoJ consultation into mesothelioma claims.
Acting on behalf of Ladbrokes in the recent Court of Appeal case of Nicholls v Ladbrokes (2013) ECWA Civ 1963, a Post Traumatic Stress Disorder case involving allegations of negligence and breach of statutory duty following an armed robbery.
We successfully defended the Defendant in the case of Marian Holloway v Tyne Thames Technology Ltd, in which a UK court considered de minimis issues in a noise induced hearing loss (NIHL) case. This was a significant and positive decision for insurers continuing to face an unprecedented surge in deafness claims.
Acting on behalf of a Local Authority in the Mesothelioma Trigger Litigation in the Supreme Court leading to a successful judgment that policies of Employers liability insurance will respond for injuries sustained or contracted at the date of inhalation of asbestos. BAI (Run Off) Limited (In Scheme of Arrangement) v Durham [2012] UKSC 14.
Partner
Partner
Partner
Partner
See more