Projects & Construction
Click each term to find out more
Although occasionally disputes are inevitable, a large part of Kate’s practice is assisting clients in the avoidance of disputes. This is through acting as project counsel; providing early, pragmatic and strategic advice at all level of her client’s business in order to prevent the unnecessary escalation and expense of disputes.
However, when a dispute is unavoidable, Kate will work closely with her clients to understand the technical issues at hand and her client’s overall commercial aims, to devise and deliver a strategy for the cost-efficient resolution of the issues. In this area, the majority of Kate’s practice focusses on the resolution of complex and high value construction and engineering disputes. Kate routinely advise and acts on a wide range of contracts, including bespoke FIDIC, IChemE, NEC3 and NEC4 and JCT in a range of forums, including adjudication, litigation, arbitration, mediation and early neutral evaluation.
Kate is notably experienced in running complex, high value, multi-party, litigation in the Technology and Construction Court, with a track record of achieving results for clients. Kate has been ranked by Chambers and Partners for the last five years and is praised for “offering an excellent level of support” for clients and her ability to “provides detailed legal advice on complex areas”. Her clients praise Kate for her “pragmatic” advice and "tenacity" in getting a positive result.
Go to next section
Practice Areas
Kate is a specialist in the avoidance and resolution of disputes within the construction, engineering, infrastructure and renewables sectors. She has a contractor-focussed practice with particular expertise in devising and implementing strategy to navigate clients through large, complex and multi-tiered disputes and achieve their ultimate commercial aims.
Although occasionally disputes are inevitable, a large part of Kate’s practice is assisting clients in the avoidance of disputes. This is through acting as project counsel; providing early, pragmatic and strategic advice at all level of her client’s business in order to prevent the unnecessary escalation and expense of disputes.
However, when a dispute is unavoidable, Kate will work closely with her clients to understand the technical issues at hand and her client’s overall commercial aims, to devise and deliver a strategy for the cost-efficient resolution of the issues. In this area, the majority of Kate’s practice focusses on the resolution of complex and high value construction and engineering disputes. Kate routinely advise and acts on a wide range of contracts, including bespoke FIDIC, IChemE, NEC3 and NEC4 and JCT in a range of forums, including adjudication, litigation, arbitration, mediation and early neutral evaluation.
Kate is notably experienced in running complex, high value, multi-party, litigation in the Technology and Construction Court, with a track record of achieving results for clients. Kate has been ranked by Chambers and Partners for the last five years and is praised for “offering an excellent level of support” for clients and her ability to “provides detailed legal advice on complex areas”. Her clients praise Kate for her “pragmatic” advice and "tenacity" in getting a positive result.
Projects & Construction
Projects & Construction
Dispute Escalation Mechanism: A Curate’s Egg?
Case Law Update: BDW Trading Limited v Ardmore Construction Limited
CfD awards: a boost for the UK renewable energy industry?